Hiring

The Pudding Most platforms give you one way to work. You post a listing. Someone hires you. You do the thing. You get paid. That’s it. One model, one path, one shape that every working relationship has to fit into whether it fits or not. The problem is obvious to anyone who has actually worked: not all work is the same shape. Sometimes you need a full team member embedded for months. Sometimes you need someone for forty-five minutes on a Tuesday. Sometimes you want to test a stranger’s skills before committing. Sometimes you want to split the payment between cash and cooperative equity. Sometimes you just want to throw a problem into the air and see who catches it. ...

Not Everyone Works the Same Way Traditional job boards give you one option: apply, interview, get hired, clock in. That model works for some people. It fails spectacularly for everyone else — the single parent who can only commit twelve hours a week, the retired machinist who wants to consult on one project at a time, the college student looking for tasks she can knock out between classes. Liana Banyan was built around a simple premise: if people work in fundamentally different ways, the platform should support fundamentally different hiring models. We landed on seven. ...

Position Funding Hybrid Compensation Framework A work compensation system offering: Option A: 50% Platform Credits + 50% Platform Joules Option B: 100% Platform Credits (deferred) + 20% Bonus Option C: 100% Platform Joules (2x value) Fractional position support (0.6x, 0.5x, 0.4x) SLA tracking for backup positions Why This Matters Traditional hiring forces a binary choice: pay now or don’t hire. Position Funding creates a third path where workers become member-owners and projects get built even when immediate funds are tight. ...